Jews criticized for challenging incumbent judges whose terms have expired. Could it be something else? Read on.

Comment taken from a comment thread on a story appearing on Buddy Nevins' Broward Beat:  "Citizens for a strong Judiciary supports our judiciary for its record of accomplishment. Here is a sampling of it’s fine work: Here’s a brief recent history of our judiciary that “The Citizens for a Strong Judiciary” calls great Judges: The “crying on tv” anna nicole smith judge who was investigated for manipulating an old lady out of her life savings; one judge calling immigration on suspected illegals and another judge sending him threatening emails; one judge smoking marijuana in a park surrounded by children; one judge alluding to the courthouse cleaning staff as ‘living in hovels”; one judge (investigated by the JQC and the Florida Bar) having dinner (or more) with her prosecutor (and discussing the crime scene photos) during a murder trial in which both were involved, not to mention the thousands of text messages shared between the two during the trial; one judge incarcerating a young black potential juror for 4 months for lying during jury selection process and running her courtroom like a bully; one judge reprimanded for being arrogant and disrespectful, not to mention allowing her religious beliefs to influence her rulings; one judge publicly referring to another judge as lesbian; one judge referring to litigants in a criminal trial as “NHI,” (No Humans Involved); one judge referring to a gay criminal defendant (a football player) as a ‘wide receiver”; one judge reprimanded for accepting gifts (baseball tickets) from the lawyers who appear before him and not disclosing it; one judge (pressured to retire early) for accepting loans from a lawyer who appeared before him and not disclosing it; one judge who gives everyone the maximum sentence because ‘he can.’ Shall I continue?